A nurse who was sacked from the NHS after offering a Bible to a cancer patient and encouraging him to sing The Lord is My Shepherd was fairly dismissed, a court has ruled.
Sarah Kuteh was fired from her job at Darent Valley Hospital in Dartford, Kent, England in 2016 for repeatedly talking to patients about her faith and handing out a Bible, in breach of Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) rules.
A ruling, published last week by the Court of Appeal, stated that on June 3, 2016, a patient at the hospital had complained about Ms Kuteh's conduct.
The court heard how the patient likened the incident to a 'Monty Python skit', which he said was 'very bizarre' - in which she encouraged him to sing along to Psalm 23 with her.
The ruling, which upheld a decision that she was fairly dismissed by the Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, stated: "On 20 June, 2016, the Complaints Department noted a call from a patient being treated for cancer concerning his assessment by the claimant on 3 June, 2016."
'He had replied 'open minded' to the question on the form concerning religion and alleged the claimant had told him that the only way he could get to the Lord was through Jesus.
'(She) told him she would give him her Bible if he did not have one; gripped his hand tightly and said a prayer that was very intense and went 'on and on'; and asked him to sing Psalm 23 [The Lord is My Shepherd], after which he was so astounded that he had sung the first verse with her.
He described the encounter as 'very bizarre' and 'like a Monty Python skit'.
She also said the tribunal had failed to acknowledge that Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights - Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs - was 'applicable' and to 'consider the fact-sensitive distinction between true evangelism and improper proselytism'.
Judges at the Court of Appeal, however, rejected the nurse's most recent appeal, saying she was not unfairly dismissed in a ruling published last week.
The ruling, presided over by Lord Justice Gross, Lord Justice Singh and Lord Justice Haddon-Cave, stated: 'The Respondent employer [Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust] did not have a blanket ban on religious speech at the workplace.
"What was considered to be inappropriate was for the claimant [Ms Kuteh] to initiate discussions about religion and for her to disobey a lawful instruction given to her by management.
"It is important that cases such as this should not become over-elaborate or excessively complicated."
The essence of this case can be summarised as follows:
"The claimant accepted that on at least some occasions she initiated conversations with patients about religion.
"On 11 April, 2016 the claimant gave an assurance to Ms Gill [the supervising matron] that she would not initiate such discussions.
"Despite that assurance, given in response to a lawful management instruction, the claimant continued to do so.
"In particular the incident on 3 June, 2016, which the patient concerned described as 'very bizarre' and 'like a Monty Python skit', was on any view clearly inappropriate.
"The respondent conducted a fair procedure, by way of investigation, at the disciplinary hearing and at the subsequent appeal.
"The decision to dismiss the claimant for misconduct was one which the Employment Tribunal (ET) concluded fell within the band of reasonable responses open to the Respondent in this case.
"Even having regard to the importance of the right to freedom of religion, it was plainly open to the ET to conclude that this dismissal had not been unfair.
"Similarly, the Employment Appeal Tribunal was plainly correct, in my view, to regard the appeal as having no reasonable prospect of success and therefore in dismissing it.
"For the reasons I have given I would dismiss this appeal.''
Enjoyed reading our story? Download BRIEFLY's news app on Google Play now and stay up-to-date with major South African news!