Zuma does not have enough to offer as a state witness to deserve amnesty- Legal experts

Zuma does not have enough to offer as a state witness to deserve amnesty- Legal experts

- Legal experts agree that Zuma could only be considered as a state witness if he could offer a conviction of greater value than himself

- Even if it were to convict the Guptas there is enough evidence to successfully bring a case against them to trial

- Zuma's other potential charges of corruption and racketeering also rule him out as a credible witness

PAY ATTENTION: Click “See First” under the “Following” tab to see Briefly.co.za News on your News Feed!

The whole concept of offering amnesty for someone turning state witness lies in the simple rule of supply and demand. In order for the state to consider offering the amnesty, the accused must offer up a conviction of someone of greater value than themselves.

For Jacob Zuma, this is simply not possible. According to attorney Tony Miguel, section 204 of the Criminal Procedure Act allows for state witnesses to receive amnesty. This is only used when the state requires the cooperation of a witness who our party to a crime to testify.

"The reason for section 204 was to enable the state to use the evidence of people lower in importance than the kingpin in order to secure the conviction,” said Wits associate law professor and practising advocate Professor James Grant.

READ ALSO: ANC's Chicco Twala and Winnie Mandela's EFF niece in house row

According to Grant, there would be no rational reason to offer amnesty to Zuma or enter into a plea bargain.

Briefly.co.za learned that a plea bargain would also not be an option as he would have to give evidence against someone who was way more important than him, and there just isn’t. It would be absolutely irrational,” Grant said according to the citizen.co.za.

However, Attorney Tracy Lomax has said that Zuma's testimony would be instrumental in securing a conviction against the Guptas.

Lomax conceded that Zuma's testimony would not necessarily be needed in the wake of the mounds of evidence which implicate the Guptas.

READ ALSO: Opposition parties call for Parliament to be dissolved and fresh elections

In light of Zuma's other pending charges of corruption and racketeering, it would make little sense to offer him amnesty. The only situation where Section 204 would be considered as if the Guptas were the masterminds behind state capture.

Do you have a story to share with us? Inbox us on our Facebook page and we could feature your story.

To stay up to date with the latest news, download our news app on Google Play or iTunes today.

Source: Briefly.co.za

Related news
Muug & Bean eat their own words as they deny racist statement and reinstate black manager

Racist franchisee reinstates black manager after public backlash at Mugg & Bean

Muug & Bean eat their own words as they deny racist statement and reinstate black manager
Briefly.co.za