Zuma owes state R15.3 million in legal fees, but only if the court orders it

Zuma owes state R15.3 million in legal fees, but only if the court orders it

- Ramaphosa answered questions at his maiden question and answer session in Parliament

- During the questioning, he addresses Jacob Zuma's legal fees and his obligations to repay the state

- The DA and EFF want Zuma to pay the fees, but Ramaphosa says it will only be necessary if the court orders it

PAY ATTENTION: Click “See First” under the “Following” tab to see Briefly.co.za News on your News Feed!

President Cyril Ramaphosa confirmed in the National Assembly on Wednesday that the State has paid a total of R15.3m for Zuma's personal legal fees since 2006.

Of that, R7.5m was spent on the period, from 2006 until the withdrawal of corruption charges against him in 2009. Since 2009, an additional R7.8m was spent.

The basis of the legal aid was an agreement reached by Zuma and the Presidency in 2006 under then president Thabo Mbeki, on advice from the State Attorney's office and the Department of Justice.

READ ALSO: EFF's Shivambu supports colonialism, Twitter says after Gigaba's nationality is questioned

"The former president signed an undertaking to refund the State if he was found to have acted in his personal capacity and own interests in the commission of offences of which he was charged," Ramaphosa said during his maiden question session to the House, Briefly.co.za learned.

"This administration is guided by the fundamental principle that State money should not be used to cover the legal fees of individuals on strictly personal matters and are found to have committed criminal offences," he said.

EFF MP Julius Malema, who had asked the original question, claimed the amount, including the Nkandla saga and others, was probably closer to R64m.

"I am not aware of that amount," Ramaphosa answered.

"We are using the agreement struck before former president Zuma and the government, on the understanding that the money will be paid back if he has been found to be personally responsible for these acts."

"He must pay it back!" shouted a few DA MPs.

Ramaphosa continued. There was also an argument that Zuma, while not president of the country, was still a government employee at the time of the conduct, and the charges relate to his work in government.

If the court makes a different assessment, it will be up to the courts, and they would wait for the outcome.

"Right now, because the agreement is still in place, there is simply no way we can say in violation of agreement that was reached, he must pay the cost."

Malema and EFF chief whip Floyd Shivambu also wanted to know what law or legal basis the State relied on in forming the agreement.

"I will need to check that more closely," Ramaphosa admitted.

"I have written a question to him two weeks ago, and he says he must get back to me. What is the point of writing a question?" Malema said.

Ramaphosa admitted he thought he had answered the question as was written.

"Clearly you are not happy, and I undertake to get the information for you," Ramaphosa said.

"Now that is being presidential," a placated Malema said.

"Date and time!" yelled Shivambu.

Ramaphosa promised that the agreement, signed by Zuma in 2006, will also be made available in the court proceedings, and that they would keep an eye on the case.

"Pass it along," Democratic Alliance chief whip John Steenhuisen said.

READ ALSO: SA government blasts plans by Australia to fast-track visas for white farmers

Do you have a story to share with us? Inbox us on our Facebook page and we could feature your story.

To stay up to date with the latest news, download our news app on Google Play or iTunes today.

Source: Briefly.co.za

Mailfire view pixel