Electoral Court Defends Rejecting ANC Bid to Validate Incomplete Candidate Nominations

Electoral Court Defends Rejecting ANC Bid to Validate Incomplete Candidate Nominations

  • The Electoral Court in Bloemfontein has defended why it ruled against the ANC in a case involving the IEC and the DA over candidate nominations
  • The ANC argued that information captured before the statutory deadline should be recognised as final submissions
  • The court warned that accepting provisional entries as final would compromise the integrity of the electoral system
The Electoral Court defended its decision to dismiss the ANC's application to extend the IEC's deadline for candidate submissions
The Electoral Court stood by its ruling against the ANC in its fight with the IEC. Images: Emmanuel Croset/ AFP via Getty Images and Per-Anders Pettersson/Getty Images
Source: Getty Images

SOUTH AFRICA — The Electoral Court has explained why it ruled against the African National Congress in its attempt to have incomplete candidate nominations recognised as valid submissions, dealing a significant blow to the governing party ahead of the electoral process.

Newzroom Afrika journalist Zoleka Qodashe posted the judgement, which was handed down in Bloemfontein in the matter between the ANC, the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC), and the Democratic Alliance. The court found that provisional candidate nominations left on the IEC's electronic system after the statutory deadline could not lawfully be treated as final.

Read also

ANC takes candidate registration blunder to Constitutional Court on 7 October

ANC's core argument dismissed

The ANC had contended that any information captured on the system before the cut-off time should automatically qualify as a final submission. The court rejected this reasoning outright. In paragraphs 74 and 75 of the judgment, the bench noted that adopting such an approach would compel the IEC to make retrospective inferences about a party's intentions based on forms that remained open to alteration, replacement, or withdrawal right up to the deadline.

PAY ATTENTION: You can now search for all your favourite news and topics on Briefly News.

The judges cautioned that blurring the line between provisional and final entries would introduce uncertainty into the electoral process and force the commission into ex post facto assessments of nomination statuses — precisely the kind of ambiguity that firm statutory deadlines exist to prevent.

Integrity of electoral timelines upheld

The court further warned that granting the ANC's relief would undermine the principles of fairness, certainty, and equal treatment that underpin the nomination process. Relaxing deadline enforcement for one party, the bench reasoned, risks compromising the integrity of the entire electoral system.

Read also

ANC weighs next legal move after Electoral Court rejects candidate appeal

The ruling confirms that the IEC's prescribed nomination window is binding, and that political parties cannot lean on unsubmitted, provisional digital records once that window has closed.

Read the tweet on X:

Fikile Mbalula taken to court over candidate list

In a related article, Briefly News reported on ANC NEC member Andile Lungisa’s legal challenge against his removal from the party’s proportional representation candidate list. The case names ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula and centres on administrative errors that excluded 252 candidates from the final rolls.

Source: Briefly News

Authors:
Tebogo Mokwena avatar

Tebogo Mokwena (Current Affairs editor) Tebogo Mokwena is a senior current affairs writer at Briefly News. With a Diploma in Journalism from ALISON, he has a strong background in digital journalism, having completed training with the Google News Initiative. He began his career as a journalist at Daily Sun, where he worked for four years before becoming a sub-editor and journalist at Capricorn Post. He then joined Vutivi Business News in 2020 before moving to Briefly News in 2023. Email: tebogo.mokwena@briefly.co.za