“We’ll Learn From His Mistake”: SA Man Loses R416K After Renovating Girlfriend’s Home, Court Rules
- A South African man used more than R416,000 from his pension payout to renovate and extend his girlfriend's home while they lived together
- When the relationship ended in 2019, he took the matter to the Limpopo High Court, claiming a share of the property
- The court ruled that contributing money to a partner's home does not automatically create legal ownership rights
PAY ATTENTION: Mark Briefly News as a preferred source, and our content will appear higher in your Google feed!
Source: Getty Images
A South African man lost over R416,000 after spending his pension payout on his girlfriend's home, only to discover the law did not see it the way he did.
The couple began living together in 2014 at a property the girlfriend owned. Because the house was too small for their needs, the boyfriend dipped into a portion of his pension and spent R416,388.77 extending and improving it. They also split household costs, each contributing R300 a month. By 2019, the relationship had broken down and he moved out.
He then took the matter to the Limpopo High Court, arguing that their shared life and his financial contributions had created what is known in South African law as a "universal partnership," essentially a joint estate. He wanted the assets sold, and the proceeds split equally between them.
What the court found
According to the Limpopo High Court, his girlfriend disagreed. She argued the renovation money was a voluntary gesture to make their shared home more comfortable, not a legal claim to her property.
PAY ATTENTION: You can now search for all your favourite news and topics on Briefly News.
Acting Judge Bresler sided with her and dismissed the boyfriend's case, ordering him to pay legal costs as well. The court found that he had only shown he put money into the house. He could not prove that the couple had actually pooled all their assets together or that there was any mutual intention to profit from a joint venture. Sharing expenses and improving a living space, the court noted, is simply what people in relationships do. It does not constitute a legal partnership.
Source: Getty Images
What the law says about cohabitation
South African law does not recognise a common law marriage. No matter how long two people live together or how much one partner contributes financially, the other's property remains solely theirs unless a formal agreement says otherwise. To claim a share of a partner's assets, a person must prove a universal partnership existed, and the threshold for that is high.
Legal experts advise that anyone planning to invest seriously in a partner's property should put a cohabitation agreement in writing first. Without one, money spent on renovations can legally be treated as a gift, with no right to reclaim it if the relationship ends.
View the Reddit post here.
Mzansi reacts to situation
South Africans on r/propertyZA's page had little sympathy for the man's situation:
@Advanced_Passage_492 asked:
"Would this not be considered unjust enrichment?"
@Mihlz said:
"Why would you even?"
@No-Lead-3975 wrote:
"At least we'll learn from his mistake. Thank you"
@Kosmo1_ commented:
"Always a bad choice"
@JouMaSeKont1973 laughed:
"...Betting on a not-so-sure thing 😂"
More briefly News stories on pensioners
- Durban pensioners protested for a SASSA grant increase from R2,400 to R5,000, with a TikTok highlighting their financial struggles and calls for dignity and support.
- NOAH’s Athlone Knitwits warmed the hearts of pensioners waiting outside a Cape Town SASSA office by handing out blankets and celebrating a 99-year-old’s birthday.
- South African retirees receiving foreign pensions were warned that hidden bank fees could quietly eat into their income by as much as R13,000 a year.
PAY ATTENTION: Follow Briefly News on Twitter and never miss the hottest topics! Find us at @brieflyza!
Source: Briefly News
