Musk found not liable in Tesla tweet trial

Jurors on Friday found Elon Musk not liable for investors' losses in a fraud trial over his 2018 tweets falsely claiming that he had funding in place to take Tesla private.

The tweets sent the Tesla share price on a rollercoaster ride, and Musk was sued by shareholders who said the tycoon acted recklessly in an effort to squeeze investors who had bet against the company.

Jurors deliberated for barely two hours before returning to the San Francisco courtroom to say they unanimously agreed that neither Musk nor the Tesla board perpetrated fraud with the tweets and the aftermath.

"Ultimately, it's about whether rules that apply to everyone else should also apply to Elon Musk," attorney Nicholas Porritt, who represents Glen Littleton and other investors in Tesla, told the nine jurors during closing arguments.

Read also

Jury mulls whether Musk's 2018 Tesla tweet was fraud

"Elon Musk published tweets that were false with reckless disregard as to their truth."

Porritt pointed to expert testimony estimating that Musk's claim about funding, which turned out not to be true, cost investors billions of dollars overall and that Musk and the Tesla board should be made to pay damages.

But Musk attorney Alex Spiro successfully countered in court that the billionaire may have erred on wording in a hasty tweet, but that he did not set out to deceive anyone.

Spiro also portrayed the mercurial entrepreneur, who now owns Twitter, as having had a troubled childhood and having come to the United States as a poor youth chasing dreams.

No joke

Musk testified during the trial that his 2018 tweet about taking Tesla private at $420 a share was no joke and that Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund was serious about helping him do it.

Read also

Sushi conveyor belt pranks spark outrage in Japan

"To Elon Musk, if he believes it or even just thinks about it then it's true no matter how objectively false or exaggerated it may be," Porritt told jurors.

Tesla and its board were also to blame, because they let Musk use his Twitter account to post news about the company, Porritt argued.

The case revolves around a pair of tweets in which Musk said "funding secured" for a project to buy out the publicly-traded electric automaker, then in a second tweet added that "investor support is confirmed."

"He wrote two words 'funding secured' that were technically inaccurate," Musk attorney Alex Spiro said of Musk while addressing jurors.

"Whatever you think of him, this isn't a bad tweeter trial, it's a 'did they prove this man committed fraud?' trial."

Musk did not intend to deceive anyone with the tweets, and had the connections and wealth to take Tesla private, Spiro contended.

Read also

Moving the goalposts: NFL scare reveals conspiracist playbook

During the trial playing out in federal court in San Francisco, Spiro said that even though the tweets may have been a "reckless choice of words," they were not fraud.

"I'm being accused of fraud; it's outrageous," Musk said while testifying in person.

Musk said he fired off the tweets at issue after learning of a Financial Times story about a Saudi Arabian investment fund wanting to acquire a stake in Tesla.

The trial came at a sensitive time for Musk, who has dominated the headlines for his chaotic takeover of Twitter where he has laid off more than half of the 7,500 employees and scaled down content moderation.

Source: AFP