“Thanks for the Clarity”: KZN Lawyer Explains When SA Law Allows Secret Recordings, Mzansi Reacts

“Thanks for the Clarity”: KZN Lawyer Explains When SA Law Allows Secret Recordings, Mzansi Reacts

  • Durban-based lawyer Dharini Rangasamy posted a TikTok explaining when South Africans are legally allowed to record conversations without consent
  • Rangasamy broke down the key distinction in South African law between recording a conversation you are part of versus intercepting one you are not
  • South Africans flooded the comments with legal questions about workplace recordings, medical consultations, and camera eyewear
Rangasamy Attorneys Inc
Screenshots taken from the clip. Images: Rangasamy Attorneys Inc
Source: TikTok

A Durban lawyer has sparked a heated legal discussion online after posting a TikTok video clearing up one of South Africa’s most misunderstood laws. Dharini Rangasamy, director of Rangasamy Attorneys Inc., posted the clip on 25 July 2026 under her series called Legal Tea, and it quickly drew thousands of viewers hungry for answers.

Rangasamy’s central point was simple but widely misunderstood: being told “you can’t record me without my permission” is not always legally accurate in South Africa.

What SA law says

According to Rangasamy, South African law generally permits a person to record a conversation they are actively part of, without informing the other party. This applies whether the conversation is happening in person or over the phone.

Read also

“We’ve heard that for years”: SA outraged as Mzansi man breaks down new smoking laws in TikTok video

PAY ATTENTION: You can now search for all your favourite news and topics on Briefly News.

This principle is rooted in the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act (RICA), Act 70 of 2002, which governs the interception of private communications in South Africa. Under RICA, intercepting a communication you are not a party to is unlawful. However, recording a conversation you are participating in falls outside the definition of unlawful interception.

This is precisely why recordings regularly surface in labour disputes, divorce proceedings, commercial disagreements, and criminal cases. Rangasamy noted three situations where people do cross a legal line: secretly recording conversations between others, planting a recording device in a room to capture people without their knowledge, and intercepting private communications you have no part in.

Watch Dharini Rangasamy break down South Africa’s recording laws on TikTok:

Mzansi reacts to the legal breakdown

The video struck a chord, with viewers sharing personal scenarios and pushing for more clarity.

Read also

Gayton McKenzie comes under fire after calling for PSL action on ‘thuggery’ in football

@Suuu’duuude asked:

“Does the same go for video recordings?”

@Okasa wanted to know:

“I have video evidence between a doctor and myself. Can this be used as evidence?”

@zebediaskingzebrah simply wrote:

“At least I learned something today.”

@Kgoshigadi R asked:

“The eyewear that has cameras recording, are those legal?”

Source: Briefly News

Authors:
Jim Mohlala avatar

Jim Mohlala (Editor) Jim Mohlala is a Human Interest writer for Briefly News (joined in 2025). Mohlala holds a Postgraduate Diploma in Media Leadership and Innovation and an Advanced Diploma in Journalism from the Cape Peninsula University of Technology. He started his career working at the Daily Maverick and has written for the Sunday Times and TimesLIVE. Jim has several years of experience covering social justice, crime and community stories. You can reach him at jim.mohlala@briefly.co.za