Murdoch sues small Australian news outlet for defamation

Murdoch sues small Australian news outlet for defamation

Fox Corporation CEO Lachlan Murdoch (R), pictured with father Rupert, is suing independent media outlet Crikey for defafamation
Fox Corporation CEO Lachlan Murdoch (R), pictured with father Rupert, is suing independent media outlet Crikey for defafamation. Photo: SCOTT OLSON / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/Getty Images via AFP
Source: AFP

New feature: Check out news exactly for YOU ➡️ find “Recommended for you” block and enjoy!

Fox News boss Lachlan Murdoch has launched legal proceedings against Australian media outlet Crikey, accusing the site of defaming him in an opinion piece about the January 6 US Capitol riots.

The lawsuit was filed late Tuesday in Australian federal court, a day after Crikey made public a cache of legal letters sent by Murdoch's lawyers since the article's June publication and dared the media scion to sue it.

Crikey even took out an advert in the New York Times on Monday, publishing an open letter that welcomed the opportunity to "test this important issue of freedom of public interest journalism in a courtroom".

Murdoch is chief executive of media behemoth Fox Corporation and co-chairman of News Corp.

He is the eldest son of billionaire media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, owner of scores of outlets including Fox News, The Wall Street Journal and the New York Post.

Read also

Whistleblower accuses Twitter of hiding major flaws

Crikey's article -- headlined "Trump is a confirmed unhinged traitor. And Murdoch is his unindicted co-conspirator" -- did not name the younger Murdoch directly.

PAY ATTENTION: Follow Briefly News on Twitter and never miss the hottest topics! Find us at @brieflyza!

However, it did refer to the "Murdochs and their slew of poisonous Fox News commentators" in its final paragraph.

Murdoch's lawyers claimed in letters to Crikey that their client was defamed 22 times in the article and its social media posts.

While Crikey initially deleted the article on the day it was published as a "goodwill gesture" after Murdoch's lawyers made contact, the piece was reinstated amid the legal wrangling.

Crikey editor Peter Fray and chairman Eric Beecher said Wednesday that the site "stands by its story".

"We look forward to defending our independent public interest journalism in court against the considerable resources of Lachlan Murdoch," they said.

Read also

Ex-security chief accuses Twitter of hiding major flaws

"We believe that coverage of the events of January 6 at the US Capitol, and the role of Fox News in those events, is absolutely legitimate."

Murdoch's representatives were also approached for comment.

The story has made waves in Australia, where the Murdoch family remains a major player in the local media despite its global expansion.

Former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull even weighed into the saga Wednesday saying he was "very surprised" by Murdoch's decision.

"I think it's hypocritical," he told radio show RN Breakfast, adding that the Murdochs were "always bleating about freedom of speech, and how the defamation laws are too harsh."

Australia's tough libel laws offer few protections to the media and have earned the country the nickname "the defamation capital of the world".

New feature: check out news exactly for YOU ➡️ find "Recommended for you" block and enjoy!

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.