Push for new US lithium mine leaves some Americans wary

Push for new US lithium mine leaves some Americans wary

A proposed mining project by Piedmont Lithium in North Carolina is facing opposition from residents including retired county district attorney Locke Bell, pictured, over environmental fears
A proposed mining project by Piedmont Lithium in North Carolina is facing opposition from residents including retired county district attorney Locke Bell, pictured, over environmental fears. Photo: Allison Joyce / AFP
Source: AFP

When Kristal Lee and her husband bought a house in Gaston County, North Carolina two years ago, they envisioned a "forever home". But a planned lithium mine is bringing Lee sleepless nights.

Nearby is an area earmarked for a $1.2 billion project to produce battery grade lithium for US electric vehicle (EV) supply chains -- one of only a few such sites in the country.

"You get very anxious when you hear about it," she said of the project by Piedmont Lithium.

"We don't really have an option of moving right now, especially with the economy and inflation."

With President Joe Biden working to build domestic EV and battery industries, companies are seeking supplies in United States -- which has major lithium deposits in Nevada, North Carolina and California.

Read also

More money pledged for flood-stricken Brazil

Biden's aims include furthering the energy transition and lowering dependence on China, which supplies the bulk of global lithium-ion battery exports.

Lithium-ion battery demand is set to grow nearly 30 percent annually from 2022-2030, according to McKinsey & Company.

However, pushback against Piedmont and others underscore how officials' efforts leave some residents skeptical.

Balancing act

Gaston County resident Kristal Lee, 41, said she has been losing sleep since learning about the planned mine in her vicinity
Gaston County resident Kristal Lee, 41, said she has been losing sleep since learning about the planned mine in her vicinity. Photo: Allison Joyce / AFP
Source: AFP

Top risks of mining include water pollution and reducing water supplies, said Aimee Boulanger, executive director at the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA).

"Moving rock to get minerals opens up land and risks the soil and metals normally locked in the earth washing into streams, rivers, and drinking water," added Boulanger, whose organization certifies mines for major companies.

Lee, 41, has five children and worries about dust and noise from the open pit mine where Piedmont plans to conduct blasting once or twice daily as needed.

Read also

Amazonian chief at UN to combat traditional knowledge piracy

The company maintains that this would not cause structural damage nearby.

Her neighbors also fear water contamination or a supply disruption.

Piedmont plans to test and treat water that drains into its pits before using or discharging it.

The company's back-ups involve potentially drilling new wells, providing access to municipal water supplies, or supplying bottled water -- but this has failed to quell jitters.

"We need to work to ensure that (mines) don't cause harm that outweighs or outlasts" benefits, said Boulanger.

'Get it right'

Gaston County resident Jim McMahan, 65, worries about the impact that blasting at the mine might have on his animals
Gaston County resident Jim McMahan, 65, worries about the impact that blasting at the mine might have on his animals. Photo: Allison Joyce / AFP
Source: AFP

Resident Jim McMahan said the mine life of around a decade is another concern.

"They will provide jobs for a period of time," the 65-year-old retiree, who has taken up farming, said. But eventually "the jobs will be gone and maybe, the farms will be gone."

Reducing emissions can be a legitimate argument for developing new industries, notes Locke Bell, 73, a retired county district attorney.

Read also

A gloomy season for Ethiopia's 'green gold' at the khat market

"I want clean air," he said, "but I don't want reckless destruction of the earth and the waters to produce a minimal amount of lithium."

This month, Piedmont Lithium received a North Carolina state mining permit, but it needs further local permissions.

Chad Brown, chair of the Gaston County Board of Commissioners, said: "We have to get it right. They have to make sure they assure us."

He said a decision could be reached by November.

Lee learned about the mine a year after moving into her current home -- when Piedmont mailed the family a gift of coffee and a note.

"I've lost enough sleepless nights," she said.

Negative view?

Signs indicating opposition are seen outside homes near a proposed lithium mine in North Carolina
Signs indicating opposition are seen outside homes near a proposed lithium mine in North Carolina. Photo: Allison Joyce / AFP
Source: AFP

Piedmont's project is expected to produce 30,000 metric tons of lithium hydroxide annually, "significantly" boosting US capacity.

The world's top lithium producer Albemarle is also working to reopen a dormant mine in Kings Mountain, North Carolina.

The company said it benefited from policies like the Inflation Reduction Act and received nearly $150 million via a Department of Energy grant to support costs.

Read also

Anglo American to split group after rejecting BHP bid

Biden has been struggling to win over Americans with his economic policies, despite the surge in investments they have triggered.

In Gaston County, the situation leaves a "negative" view of the government's clean energy push, Bell said.

Lee said she supports clean energy but is less convinced of EVs, citing a lack of charging infrastructure and high costs even with tax rebates.

McMahan described the lithium mining process as "invasive."

"I really do not feel that the push for electric vehicles is something that is being done in the way that it should be done," he said.

PAY ATTENTION: Сheck out news that is picked exactly for YOU - click on “Recommended for you” and enjoy!

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.