Reason Endrick’s Penalty for Real Madrid Against Espanyol Was Not ‘Robbery’: Explained

• Endrick Felipe won a controversial penalty for Real Madrid in their 4-1 win against Espanyol at the Santiago Bernabeu
• The Brazilian wonderkid appeared to have been fouled by an Espanyol defender outside the box, but the referee awarded a penalty
• While the referee was certain in his mind that it was a stone-wall penalty, it has divided opinions among fans and pundits alike

Real Madrid extended their unbeaten streak to an impressive 38 matches on Saturday night with a 4-1 victory over Espanyol, albeit under controversial circumstances.

As has been the pattern this season, Los Blancos struggled to find their rhythm early on, conceding the opening goal early in the second half.

Madrid stage comeback to beat Espanyol

True to Carlo Ancelotti's style, Madrid rallied in the second half, turning the game around with goals from Dani Carvajal, Rodrygo de Goes, Vinicius Junior, and Kylian Mbappé, as noted by France24.

Read also

Reason Bellingham could land in trouble after comment to referee during Espanyol tie

Despite the convincing scoreline, controversy clouded the match, particularly surrounding Mbappé's late goal.

Endrick's controversial penalty

Substitute Endrick Felipe found himself at the centre of the drama deep into the end of the game.

The 18-year-old was involved in a moment that continues to divide fans and pundits alike.

After a dazzling solo run, Endrick was seemingly fouled by Carlos Romero just outside the penalty area.

However, the referee, with unmitigated certainty, awarded a penalty, determining that the foul had continued into the box.

Espanyol's coach, Manolo Gonzalez, strongly disagreed, insisting the referee had made a mistake.

"For me, it was not a penalty," he declared, as cited by LaLiga Extra, adding fuel to the ongoing debate.

Why Endrick's penalty was not 'robbery'?

The decision prompted scrutiny under Law 12 of the International Football Association Board (IFAB) rules, which clearly states:

Read also

Why Chelsea's Wesley Fofana avoided conceding penalty vs West Ham

"If a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area and continues holding inside the penalty area, the referee must award a penalty kick," per the FA.

Given this interpretation, the call was legitimate, affirming that Espanyol were not unfairly treated.

The win may have been wrapped in controversy, but Real Madrid’s ability to capitalise in key moments remains a hallmark of Ancelotti’s side.

Endrick explains why he didn't pass

Earlier, Briefly News reported that Endrick revealed the reason behind not to pass to more experienced teammates during his first Champions League goal.

The Brazilian wonderkid opted to shoot from distance instead of passing to Kylian Mbappe or Vinicius Junior, who were in better positions.

Endrick explained that, given the situation, taking the shot was the best option.

Source: YEN.com.gh