Kenya's Ruto urges court to throw out rival's poll challenge

Kenya's Ruto urges court to throw out rival's poll challenge

Kenyan court officials in Nairobi verify documents filed by presidential candidate Raila Odinga challenging the result of the August 9, 2022 election that handed victory to his rival William Ruto
Kenyan court officials in Nairobi verify documents filed by presidential candidate Raila Odinga challenging the result of the August 9, 2022 election that handed victory to his rival William Ruto. Photo: SIMON MAINA / AFP
Source: AFP

New feature: Check out news exactly for YOU ➡️ find “Recommended for you” block and enjoy!

Kenya's president-elect William Ruto on Friday urged the country's top court to throw out a petition by his rival Raila Odinga that challenged the result of the August 9 election.

Odinga, a veteran opposition leader who ran with the backing of President Uhuru Kenyatta and the ruling party, filed a petition to the Supreme Court on Monday, contesting the outcome of the poll that delivered victory to Ruto.

The 77-year-old politician lost his fifth bid for the presidency by a narrow margin of around 230,000 votes -- less than two percentage points -- and said he had "enough evidence" to show that he had in fact won the election.

Since 2002, no presidential election outcome in Kenya has gone uncontested, and Odinga has previously said he was cheated of victory in the 2007, 2013 and 2017 polls.

Read also

Court suspends Thai PM Prayut from office

Although polling day passed off peacefully, the announcement of the results last week sparked angry protests in some Odinga strongholds and there are fears a drawn-out dispute may lead to violence in a country with a history of post-poll unrest.

In an affidavit to the court, Ruto said Odinga had a history "of consistently disputing presidential election results and fomenting national crises after losing".

PAY ATTENTION: Follow Briefly News on Twitter and never miss the hottest topics! Find us at @brieflyza!

He accused the former prime minister of trying "to have another bite at the cherry through a judicially-forced re-run".

According to a copy of the 72-page petition seen by AFP, Odinga's team alleges that the chairman of the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission, Wafula Chebukati, failed to tally around 140,000 votes.

As a result, Ruto "did not meet the constitutional threshold of 50 percent plus 1 of the valid votes cast" -- a requirement for him to be declared the winner.

Read also

Term-limit row leaves Thai PM facing calls to quit

Judges have to issue a ruling by September 5. If they order an annulment, a new vote must be held within 60 days.

Ruto said it was "against the public interest to keep the country in a perpetual electioneering mode", arguing that the uncertainty would further damage Kenya's troubled economy which is already battling high inflation.

The IEBC was under heavy pressure to deliver a clean vote after facing sharp criticism over its handling of the August 2017 election, which was also challenged by Odinga.

The court annulled that election in a first for Africa and ordered a re-run which was boycotted by Odinga. Dozens of people died during a police crackdown on protests.

Kenya's worst electoral violence occurred after the 2007 vote, when more than 1,100 people died in politically motivated clashes involving rival tribes.

On the campaign trail, both frontrunners pledged to resolve any disputes in court rather than on the streets.

New feature: check out news exactly for YOU ➡️ find "Recommended for you" block and enjoy!

Source: AFP

Authors:
AFP avatar

AFP AFP text, photo, graphic, audio or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. AFP news material may not be stored in whole or in part in a computer or otherwise except for personal and non-commercial use. AFP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions in any AFP news material or in transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages whatsoever. As a newswire service, AFP does not obtain releases from subjects, individuals, groups or entities contained in its photographs, videos, graphics or quoted in its texts. Further, no clearance is obtained from the owners of any trademarks or copyrighted materials whose marks and materials are included in AFP material. Therefore you will be solely responsible for obtaining any and all necessary releases from whatever individuals and/or entities necessary for any uses of AFP material.