General Mkhwanazi Demands Clarity from IPID Over Investigation Withdrawal

General Mkhwanazi Demands Clarity from IPID Over Investigation Withdrawal

  • KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi has challenged the IPID's investigation process and called for accountability
  • Mkhwanazi stated that two IPID officials told him they had received a complaint from Mchunu in 2025
  • The IPID’s role has come under further scrutiny amid allegations that it has been influenced by private forensic investigator Paul O’Sullivan
  • The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) told Briefly News that it is currently busy with its internal process

Justin Williams, a journalist at Briefly News since 2024, covers South Africa’s current affairs. Before joining Briefly News, he served as a writer and chief editor at Right for Education Africa’s South African chapter.

Former IPID head Robert McBride admitted in testimony before parliament’s ad hoc committee that he did consult O’Sullivan during his tenure, but denied that IPID had been captured by him.
Mkhwanazi called for O’Sullivan to be investigated over allegations that he coordinated, planned, and controlled IPID operations from his home. Image: AdvoBarryRoux/X
Source: Twitter

KWAZULU-NATAL - KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi said the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) must explain why it opened and later withdrew an investigation against him, and why it initially claimed the probe was launched on instructions from then Police Minister Senzo Mchunu before denying this.

Read also

Madlanga Commission grants Suliman Carrim postponement as businessman to testify in March 2026

Received a complaint from Mchunu

According to Mkhwanazi, two IPID officials told him they had received a complaint from Mchunu in 2025, prompting IPID to announce an investigation into him. He said the IPID later changed its version, claiming the complaint was anonymous, before quietly withdrawing the investigation without explanation.

He said the acting head of IPID later travelled to Durban and handed him an unsigned letter withdrawing the investigation and stating that he no longer needed to respond. He added that the officials involved should testify before the commission and Parliament’s Ad Hoc committee to explain their actions. When asked whether IPID would appear before the commission, spokesperson Lizzy Suping said IPID had been mentioned several times and may be allowed to account for its work, but that the commission would decide who appears as witnesses.

Mkhwanazi called for O’Sullivan to be investigated

IPID’s role has come under further scrutiny amid allegations that it has been influenced by private forensic investigator Paul O’Sullivan, who is currently involved in a defamation lawsuit with Mkhwanazi. In his testimony, Mkhwanazi called for O’Sullivan to be investigated, alleging he coordinated and controlled IPID operations. Former IPID head Robert McBride acknowledged consulting O’Sullivan during his tenure but denied that IPID had been captured by him.

Read also

Sibonelo Nomvalo labels Mogotsi and O’Sullivan ‘spoilt brats’ over demands, South Africans debate

McBride questioned Mkhwanazi’s credibility, accusing him of interfering in IPID investigations, while describing O’Sullivan as trustworthy. O’Sullivan has denied Mkhwanazi’s allegations and has called for Mkhwanazi’s removal as provincial commissioner. O’Sullivan has refused to appear before the Madlanga Commission or Parliament’s Ad Hoc committee, citing fears for his safety.

The Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID) spokesperson Lizzy Suping told Briefly News that the police watchdog are still busy with its internal processes and will engage once it have concluded all processes.

McBride described O’Sullivan as trustworthy and Mkhwanazi as not, accusing the police chief of interfering in IPID’s investigations.
Mkhwanazi welcomed the preliminary Madlanga Commission report but would not comment on the position of Mchunu. Image: AdvoBarryRoux/X
Source: Getty Images

Criminal investigations against 14 police officials

Mkhwanazi welcomed the commission’s preliminary report but declined to comment on Mchunu’s position. The report recommended criminal investigations against 14 police officials but does not implicate Mchunu or Deputy National Police Commissioner Shadrack Sibiya, both of whom were suspended following Mkhwanazi’s allegations.

Presidential spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said Mchunu’s fate would be decided only after the commission is finalised. The absence of findings against Mchunu and Sibiya has sparked criticism on social media, including from ActionSA MP Dereleen James, who questioned their exclusion from the list of referrals for investigation.

3 More stories about General Mkhwanazi

Source: Briefly News

Authors:
Justin Williams avatar

Justin Williams (Editorial Assistant) Justin Williams joined Briefly News in 2024. He is currently the Opinion Editor and a Current Affairs Writer. He completed his Bachelor of Arts (BA) degree in Film & Multimedia Production and English Literary Studies from the University of Cape Town in 2024. Justin is a former writer and chief editor at Right for Education Africa: South African chapter. Contact Justin at justin.williams@briefly.co.za