Parliamentarians Grill Senzo Mchunu Over Failure To Produce Evidence of Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi’s Threats

Parliamentarians Grill Senzo Mchunu Over Failure To Produce Evidence of Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi’s Threats

  • Senzo Mchunu was questioned by Parliamentarians during his third day of appearing before the Ad Hoc Committee
  • The Minister of Police faced tough questions about his allegations against Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi
  • Mchunu claimed that the KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner threatened him following his letter to disband the Political Killings Task Team
Senzo Mchunu faced tough questions over his failure to produce evidence he claimed to have
Parliamentarians grilled Senzo Mchunu over his failure to produce evidence that Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi threatened him. Image: Brenton Geach
Source: Getty Images

Briefly News journalist Byron Pillay has dedicated a decade to reporting on the South African political landscape, crime, and social issues. He spent 10 years working for the Northern Natal Courier before transitioning to online journalism.

WESTERN CAPE – Senzo Mchunu has been grilled over his allegations that Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi made threats against him.

The Minister of Police claimed that he had evidence of the threats made towards him by the KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner following his letter to disband the Political Killings Task Team (PKTT). Mchunu claimed that Mkhwanazi made the threats during a conversation with his chief of staff, Cedric Nkabinde, which was recorded.

Read also

Cyril Ramaphosa says he’ll comment after Madlanga Commission ends, South Africans express doubt

Mchunu made the allegation during his appearance before Parliament’s Ad Hoc Committee on Friday, 17 October 2025, but could still not produce the evidence by Tuesday, 21 October 2025.

Parliamentarians are unhappy with Mchunu’s inability to produce evidence

During his testimony on 17 October, Mchunu played a recording from Mkhwanazi’s conversation, but it contained no evidence of a threat. Mchunu then promised to bring the recording on 21 October when he resumed testimony, but failed to do so.

Julius Malema first grilled Mchunu about the recording, saying that it needed to be put on record that the minister didn’t have the audio and therefore it didn’t exist.

The Ad Hoc Committee Chairperson, Soviet Lekganyane, then said the hearings would proceed under the premise that the evidence was not presented before the committee, to which Mchunu agreed.

If Mchunu thought that was the end of the questions about the recording, he was sadly mistaken. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party’s David Skosana also raised the issue of the audio, asking the minister if Mkhwanazi threatened him.
Mchunu changed his tune to say that he felt threatened, but actually didn’t receive a threat.

Read also

Mzansi slam Fikile Mbalula's praise for President Ramaphosa amid General Mkhwanazi's allegations

He also explained that he didn’t hear the recording but was told by Nkabinde what was said by the KZN Police Commissioner. Skosana then asked if he agreed that in the recording Parliamentarians listened to, there was no point at which Mkhwanazi threatened him.

Mchunu then claimed that the threat was made in an earlier conversation between Mkhwanazi and Nkabinde, which he thought was recorded.

David Skosana questioned Senzo Mchunu about his statement
David Skosana pushed Senzo Mchunu for clarity about his claims about the KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner. Image: Frennie Shivambu
Source: Getty Images

The matter was raised again later in proceedings when the Democratic Alliance’s Glynnis Breytenbach asked about the existence of the recording. It led to some members debating whether the minister should retract his statement about the threats or his claims that he had evidence.

What you need to know about Mchunu’s testimony before Parliament

Read also

Senzo Mchunu takes full responsibility for letter disbanding the Political Killings Task Team

Mbuyiseni Ndlozi criticises the Ad Hoc Committee

Briefly News reported that Mbuyiseni Ndlozi criticised Parliament’s Ad Hoc Committee.

Ndlozi was not happy with the way members handled Mchunu's evidence against Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi.

Some social media users agreed with Ndlozi's criticism, while others noted that Mchunu's testimony wasn't over.

Source: Briefly News

Authors:
Byron Pillay avatar

Byron Pillay (Current Affairs Editor) Byron Pillay is a Current Affairs Editor at Briefly News. He received a Diploma in Journalism from the Caxton Cadet School. He spent 15 years covering politics, crime and current affairs. He was also the Head of Department for Sports Brief, where he covered both local and international sporting news. Email: byron.pillay@briefly.co.za